Skip to main content
News You NeedRetirement Plans

Government Relations: Retirement Plan Updates

By April 26, 2021January 18th, 2022No Comments
After three months in office, the Biden Administration is beginning to build policy and regulatory momentum in a number of areas, including retirement security.

During the Trump years, there were some significant federal legislative achievements in the retirement security area, including most notably, the SECURE Act. However, the pace of federal regulatory activity slowed, and all eyes seemed to be on the Securities and Exchange Commission as its Regulation Best Interest slowly worked its way through the rulemaking process.

1. Federal ‘Fiduciary’ Standard

The Biden Administration initially surprised almost everyone by letting the Trump Administration’s prohibited transaction exemption go into effect on Feb. 16 as scheduled. This allows investment-advice fiduciaries to receive compensation for more types of guidance, including advice to roll over assets from a retirement plan to an individual retirement account (“PTE 2020-02”). Commentators and observers wondered whether the Biden Administration would focus its efforts elsewhere and avoid the battles over the ‘fiduciary’ duties and status of financial professionals that consumed the last few years of the Obama-era Department of Labor (“DOL”). At this point, it’s still unclear. However, the Biden DOL did send a ‘shot across the bow’ of fiduciary standard opponents when it indicated in recent guidance regarding PTE 2020-02 that “[t]he Department anticipates taking further regulatory and sub-regulatory actions, as appropriate, including amending the investment advice fiduciary regulation.”

2. State ‘Best Interest’ Standard

In the meantime, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ updated Annuity Suitability Model Law (#275) continues to be adopted by states, enshrining the ‘best interest’ approach as an alternative to the fiduciary standard. The updated Annuity Suitability Model Law, consistent with SEC Reg BI, requires agents, brokers and others selling annuities to act in the best interest of the consumer, and to disclose potential conflicts of interest. The rule, as revised, outlines care, disclosure, conflict of interest and documentation requirements.

Under the rule, an insurance salesperson would have to “identify and avoid or reasonably manage and disclose material conflicts of interest” and would have to maintain a written record explaining the basis for the recommendation. A customer would have to sign a disclosure document that outlines the products insurance agents can sell and how they’re paid. But the proposal would let producers continue to use commission-based compensation arrangements.

The updated Annuity Suitability Model Law includes a safe harbor for all insurance producers who are subject to, and actually comply with, equivalent or greater standards, such as Reg BI, which should help avoid duplicative compliance requirements for registered investment advisors and broker-dealers. To date, ten states (AR, AZ, DE, IA, ID, MI, ND, NE, RI and OH) have adopted the NAIC’s ‘best interest’ model.

3. PRO Act

While the ‘fiduciary’ debate continues to play out, the retirement industry has been faced with other challenges on the federal level. The Protecting the Right to Organize (“PRO”) Act sailed through the House of Representatives early on in the 117th Congress. The bill contains a wide range of provisions generally intended to protect the ability of employees to participate in collective bargaining. It would also dramatically expand the definition of an ‘employee’ in a fashion that would make insurance agents employees of the insurance carriers by whom they are appointed. This would create a myriad of complications for both agents and insurers with respect to compensation and taxation, in particular.

The PRO Act is unlikely to pass the Senate in its current form, but parts of it could be included in other bill(s). As such, the industry is working aggressively to educate Senators as to why insurance agents should be carved out of the scope of the bill.

TC120603(0421)1

Keith Jones

Keith Jones

Keith Jones is Senior Counsel responsible for government relations at National Life Group. He is an active participant in many industry trades and organizations, including ACLI, LICONY, VCIA and TALHI. He also serves as a board member of the Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine life and health insurance guaranty associations. Keith is a member of the Federation of Regulatory Counsel and a faculty member of the International Center for Captive Insurance Education. Keith graduated cum laude from Vanderbilt University and from the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. Prior to joining National Life Group, Keith was in private practice. He represented clients in the insurance industry with respect to regulatory compliance, governance, policy forms, reinsurance arrangements/transactions and mergers and reorganizations. He has also represented clients before state and federal regulatory agencies and advocated on behalf of clients before legislators, committees and administrative agencies. Keith is licensed to practice law in Vermont, Massachusetts and Washington, DC.